Human Resources > Performance > Performance Appraisal FAQ
The following frequently asked questions (FAQ’s) will help managers and employees prepare for the annual performance appraisal process for full and part-time staff. If your question is not answered below, please feel free to contact
Please note that the performance appraisal is different for students. For more information about student employee performance appraisal, please contact the Office of Student Employment at (312) 362-5599 or visit the
Office of Student Employment website.
The objective of performance management is to improve performance
The performance management process gives us an opportunity to demonstrate the intent of DePaul’s Employee Relations Philosophy. It is one of the ways we recognize the commitment and contributions made by our employees to further our mission and vision in a manner that supports our values.
When done well, performance management and appraisal fosters increased employee engagement through:
Performance management is an ongoing process. Throughout the year, managers are encouraged to engage with employees to establish goals, notice progress, provide feedback, seek feedback, appropriately reward and recognize excellent performance, and agree upon plans to correct any deficiencies.
The university has defined the annual performance appraisal cycle as a focal point for documenting performance expectations, feedback, and development planning. Managers and employees have a shared responsibility in completing the appraisal. The tool is designed to capture the employee’s self-appraisal first and then feedback from the manager. The process culminates in an appraisal meeting and discussion, held between July 1 and October 1.
There are two types of performance appraisal: the introductory period performance appraisal and the annual performance appraisal. Both use the Performance Appraisal Form (PAF), and are described below.
Introductory Period Performance Appraisal
DePaul’s performance appraisal process begins as soon as an employee starts their new job at the university. Employee job responsibilities and goals should be clarified as soon as possible from the start date. Ongoing discussions concerning the expectations, tasks, and performance should occur throughout the introductory period. A written performance appraisal must be completed prior to the conclusion of the six-month introductory period. New employees, rehired employees and transfers to full-time from part-time or student positions also participate in this process. The Introductory Period Policy states, in part:
Managers must conduct a performance appraisal prior to the completion of the introductory period. If a performance appraisal is not completed prior to the end of the introductory period, the employee will be considered to be in good (successful) standing as of the introductory period end date. If the completion of the six month introductory period coincides with the annual common review period, the six month introductory period performance appraisal will also serve as the annual performance appraisal.
If the introductory period appraisal would occur within a reasonable amount of time of the annual appraisal, the manager may elect to complete the annual appraisal only. The employee’s first annual appraisal would then also serve as his or her end of introductory period appraisal. Contact Human Resources at firstname.lastname@example.org if you have questions about the relationship between an introductory performance appraisal and an annual performance appraisal.
Annual Performance Appraisal
After the completion of the introductory period, employees participate in the annual performance appraisal process. Each year, all managers and employees engage in a written appraisal and discussion of the employee’s performance. Completed performance appraisals are submitted to the Office of Human Resources.
All full-time and part-time exempt and non-exempt staff participate in the performance appraisal process.
Faculty members complete performance appraisals for the full-time or part-time staff they supervise
The first step is for the employee to clarify any uncertainty about overall job responsibilities then agree upon up to five specific goals for the performance cycle with his or her manager. For the year-end performance review, the employee completes a self-appraisal by filling in the appropriate sections of the Performance Appraisal Form (PAF) and providing supporting comments as needed. Once their part of the PAF is completed, the employee sends it to their manager for review, ratings, and comments.
A few tips for employees to prepare a self-appraisal:
Start by contacting your manager. Managers are responsible for maintaining position descriptions. If a position description is not on file in your department, your manager may check with the Office of Human Resources. Your manager may contact a Compensation team member via email@example.com. The performance appraisal cycle is a time for you and your manager to
ensure that your position description is accurate, up to date, and on file in your reporting area and in Human Resources.
The performance appraisal uses a 5-level rating scale: Outstanding, Exceeds Expectations, Successful, Below Expectations and Unsatisfactory. When selecting a rating, consider the performance and behavior over the course of the review period.
No. The rating scale used in the performance appraisal should not be altered. It provides provide consistency across the university. Creating alternate or additional rating scales is not acceptable.
Creating performance goals based on measurable results will simplify this process. Each performance goal should contain one or more clear metrics that will delineate a measure of success for the goal. Examples include: Dollar amounts, deadlines, customer or student evaluation data, unique users or website visitors, response times, time/money saved, etc. Using these guidelines will clearly indicate whether a performance goal has been exceeded, met, or missed.
Work directly with your manager to schedule a time. Often, our hectic schedules interfere with even the most important tasks. Some managers may handle scheduling differently. One option may be to offer to schedule the meeting time. If that is appropriate, it is important to give your manager enough time to complete their part of the appraisal.
An appropriate amount of time – at least one hour – should be allotted for the meeting and discussion. The meeting should give both the manager and the employee time to discuss expectations, performance and development opportunities. However, some discussions may be brief, particularly if
performance discussion is a regular part of the manager-employee relationship.
Human Resources recommends that managers give employees a minimum of one week to review the completed form.
No, your signature indicates only that the performance appraisal discussion has taken place. You have the option to submit a separate written statement for your human resources file within two weeks of the completion of the performance appraisal.
Yes, both the manager and the employee should keep a copy of the completed and signed appraisal form for their records
If an employee is on a continuous paid or unpaid leave of absence, scheduled performance review and salary increases (if any) are postponed until the employee has returned to active work. It is recommended that the performance appraisal is completed and submitted within the first 30 days back on the job. Employees are evaluated only on work performed while on the job during the performance period.
No, employees should complete performance appraisals when they return to work. Scheduled performance review and salary increases (if any) are postponed until the employee has returned to active work. It is recommended that the performance appraisal is completed and submitted within the first 30
days back on the job Employees are evaluated only on work performed while on the job during the performance period.
The performance appraisal is completed by all employees (not in an introductory period), including those currently on a performance improvement plan. The performance appraisal should reflect the job expectations, progress made to date, and development plans.
A “Below Expectations “rating simply expresses that the employee’s overall performance is not up to the expected standards for the job. Several factors can lead to a “Below Expectations” rating. The employee may have poor results on a goal or may be inconsistent in meeting established expectations of overall job responsibilities. Behavior may not reflect the expectations expressed in DePaul’s core behaviors, or the rating could be a combination of these items. Depending on the reasons for the “Below Expectations” rating, a Performance Improvement Plan may be required. (A Performance Improvement Plan is not always required). Please contact HR Employee Relations prior to the review to discuss the reasons for the rating, and to determine if a Performance Improvement Plan is warranted.
An “Unsatisfactory” rating indicates that the employee does not meet the minimum expectations for the job in terms of results, work quality, or behaviors. Significant improvement is expected in the identified areas. If you expect to issue an “Unsatisfactory” rating, please contact HR Employee Relations prior to the review to discuss the reasons for the rating and the best course of action. A Performance Improvement Plan may or may not be warranted in the case of an “Unsatisfactory” rating depending on the circumstances.
Recommendations or suggestions should be submitted to Jason Wells in the Office of Human Resources. Additions to the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) will be collected and answered to improve the overall understanding of the performance appraisal process. Updates will be posted to support the process.
For performance management questions, please contact Sarah Frost, Manager of Organizational Development & Learning.