DePaul University Academic Affairs > Faculty Resources > Academic Integrity > Student FAQs

Student FAQs

Citation

You will first need to determine which citation style you are using. Sometimes your professor will explicitly state which citation style to use, while in other instances, it will be up to you to determine the most appropriate style. Once you have determined the best style guide for your purpose, you should locate a credible, reliable resource to use as you write. Citation styles have a tendency to change over time (to accommodate new mediums, such as YouTube and Twitter, and accommodate changes in how we access sources), and therefore it is important to use the most updated style guide when citing sources.

It is also important to note that citing a source is a two-step process: you must include both the in-text citation as well as the Works Cited/Reference entry for the source. One way to think of citations is as a map: your essay is the map, the in-text citations are the locations, and the Works Cited/Reference page is the legend. Your reader will not know what the in-text citation is referencing without the complete citation located in the Works Cited/Reference page.

Here are helpful resources to use while formatting your essay and citations:

Specific disciplines have created uniform style guides to ensure consistency in publication and formatting to make identifying and obtaining information from a specific source easier. Specific style guides tend to reflect the values of the discipline for which they were created; for example, APA places an emphasis on published research, therefore in text citations include the year of publication, whereas MLA places the emphasis on authorship, therefore in text citations include the author’s name and page number. Interestingly, APA also strives to remove gender bias in research, and therefore does not require more than a first initial when including a researcher’s name in a citation or signal phrase.

The Purdue Online Writing Lab at Purdue.edu addresses some aspects of how the three major citations styles (MLA, APA, and CMS) are typically used.

Often times, writers will blend their sources’ claims and ideas into their own more fluidly by using summaries and paraphrases, rather than direct quotations. However, regardless of how you are presenting someone else’s claims and points, you still must always include a citation. Summaries typically focus on the main idea of a text, while a paraphrase is usually a more in-depth restatement in your own words of particular points or ideas from a text.

Often times, writers will blend summaries, paraphrasing, and direct quotes together in their writing. Citations should appear as close to the paraphrased idea as possible. If you are unsure about whether to use a citation after an idea that you think you might have paraphrased, remember it is always safer to over cite than under cite.

Wikipedia offers great information about how Wikipedia should be used in terms of academic research on their Academic Use page.

As stated on the site, “any encyclopedia is a starting point for research, not an ending point.” Also, because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, all information gathered from Wikipedia should be cross-referenced to ensure its accuracy. If the information you are gathering from Wikipedia is accurate and credible, you should be able to cite the source it originally appeared in, rather than Wikipedia itself.

DePaul’s University Center for Writing-based Learning (UCWbL) is a free resource for all members of the DePaul community to receive feedback on writing, ask questions, and collaborate on all stages of the writing process.

Writing Consultants at the Writing Center have extensive knowledge and training regarding issues of both citations and plagiarism and are available to work with you in a variety of forms: face-to-face and online & webcam consultations, through the Written Feedback By Email service, and using Quick Questions and Chat with a Tutor.

You can make arrangements for all UCWbL services through their website.

Yes! If an instructor allows the usage of AI in your work, you must cite them just as you would any other source. Additionally, please reveiw your instructor's syllabus for details on the usage of AI within the course or reach out to them directly if you still have questions.


Plagiarism

Simply put, not citing a source is unethical because you are passing someone else’s ideas and research off as your own. A citation acts as an indication of where ideas and information is coming from, so that your reader can retrace the steps you took in gathering your research if they are interested in learning more about your topic.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill offers a useful analogy for thinking about using sources:

[In] the vast majority of assignments you’ll get in college, your instructors will ask you to read something (think of this material as the building blocks) and then write a paper in which you analyze one or more aspects of what you have read (think of this as the new structure you build). Essentially, your instructors are asking you to do three things:

• Show that you have a clear understanding of the material you’ve read.
• Refer to your sources to support the ideas you have developed.
• Distinguish your analysis of what you’ve read from the authors’ analyses.

When you cite a source, you are using an expert’s ideas as proof or evidence of a new idea that you are trying to communicate to the reader.

You should always quote definitions as the source of a definition can provide telling information about how you are using the term being defined. For instance, if you are using a dictionary definition, your reader might assume you are using the term more generally. If you are using a definition from a textbook or article, the definition might be more focused and have a specific contextual meaning, representing the bias of the author.

As a tip, the preferred dictionary of academic writing is the Oxford English Dictionary. Using this, as opposed to dictionary.com or other dictionaries, can boost your ethos as a scholar!

You can avoid plagiarism by citing your sources appropriately whenever you quote, paraphrase, or use another's ideas. Use a style guide (MLA, APA, etc.) to make sure you are citing correctly.

If you are not sure what constitutes plagiarism, check the Student Handbook, ask your professor, or schedule an appointment at the Writing Center.


Working With Classmates

If a classmate comes to you with questions about an assignment or paper, talking about ideas can be a very helpful practice for everyone involved (you might come to new conclusions as you share your thoughts with your classmate!) If your classmate is still confused about the assignment or essay, you can always suggest they visit their professor during office hours or to make an appointment at the Writing Center.

Many instructors will have clear expectations about what will and will not be group work in a course. If you or a classmate are caught working together on individual work, it can be considered a violation of the Academic Integrity Policy.

In most cases, your professor will make it clear what work is intended to be done individually. Discussing class material with a classmate can often be a helpful practice and can help clarify concepts and bring to light new ideas; however, assignments and essays should be done individually. Your professor may consider your work cheating if work is strikingly similar.

If you are in doubt about whether or not it is acceptable to collaborate with a classmate, ask your professor.


Reusing Work From Another Class​​​​​​

Self-plagiarism is taken seriously throughout the academic community.  If you would like to quote yourself, simply cite yourself as you would any other source.  The University of Arizona created a tool to detect self-plagiarism, explaining:

It is our belief that self-plagiarism is detrimental to scientific progress and bad for our academic community. Flooding conferences and journals with near-identical papers makes searching for information relevant to a particular topic harder than it has to be. It also rewards those authors who are able to break down their results into overlapping least-publishable-units over those who publish each result only once. Finally, whenever a self-plagiarized paper is allowed to be published, another, more deserving paper, is not.

You might argue, as a student, that this does not apply to you because you are not seeking publication.  However, at DePaul, we strive to uphold high academic standards worthy of entering the conversation at the professional level.  You can also think of it in terms of earing two grades for one work – this is simply unethical.

So, while you can cite yourself, you should do so in the same way you would any other researcher.  Using quotations of evidence for your argument, and make sure your overall argument is striving to contribute new information to the field. 

The purpose of academic writing is to come to new conclusions and create new knowledge through writing.  When you recycle papers written for previous courses and re-submit them for a new grade, you are not creating new information or knowledge to contribute to the academic community.  DePaul University’s Academic Integrity Policy specifically identifies as a form of plagiarism “Any use of words, ideas, or other work products attributed to an identifiable source, without attributing the work to the source from which it was obtained, in a situation where there is a legitimate expectation of original authorship…Submitting a work product prepared by someone else (e.g., research papers purchased from another person, website, paper mill, etc.) as one’s own work...” (DePaul University Academic Integrity Policy, Section 3.2)

If you are questioning whether or not there are serious ramifications for recycling your own work, consider the case of Jonah Lehrer, a prominent writer who was asked to resign from his job at the New Yorker because he recycled works form previously published books and blogs.  Some speculate that had Lehrer been forthright about where his claims were coming from (citing his own works) he could have avoided tarnishing his reputation and dismantling his extremely successful writing career. Read more about the fall out and reactions to Lehrer's practices here. 

Finally, when in doubt, always discuss ideas with your professor.  If you have a similar paper form a previous course, bring it to your professor during his/her office hours and discuss ways of using it as a jumping off point to come to new and unique conclusions. 

 

 

 

​

The Academic Integrity Process

Students will receive a violation letter to their DePaul email address once a professor files a formal violation. If this is a student's first violation, they have the right to appeal the violation if they believe the violation did not occur or the sanction given by the professor was too severe. Students must submit their appeal through Campus Connect within 2 weeks of receiving the formal violation letter to their email. After the submission of an appeal letter, a hearing will be scheduled for the following quarter. Students will receive information on the hearing date at least 2 weeks before the scheduled hearing.If this is a student’s second (or more) violation, a hearing will automatically be scheduled. It is recommended that students submit documentation to academicintegrity@depaul.edu. Please provide any documentation that you would like to the AIB to have access to (such as Google Docs version history, communication with the professor, etc). See details below to understand DePaul’s Academic Integrity process and timeline. 

Start: Received Notification of Violation (email sent via Campus Connect) 

Was this your first violation? Yes or No If No, see MANDATORY MULTIPLE TRIGGERED  

If Yes, do you want to file an appeal (Do you believe the violation did not occur or that the sanction for the violation was excessive?) Yes or No 

If No, the outcome is accepted and the case is closed. 

If Yes, you have two weeks to file an appeal (after receiving formal email) in Campus Connect. Your appeal statement should be formal, with complete sentences and details on why you are filing this appeal. It does not have to be too long as additional details can be provided in the supporting documentation.  After you submit an appeal, a hearing will be scheduled for the quarter following the quarter in which the violation occurred. You will be notified of the hearing date at least 2 weeks prior to the hearing. After the hearing, an outcome will be issued within 4 weeks. The outcome is final. 

*if this is your first violation, you will not be given any additional sanctions from the AIB. The AIB will only consider the sanction given by the professor. 

 MANDATORY MULTIPLE TRIGGERED 

If a violation is not your first, a hearing will automatically be scheduled for the following quarter. You will be notified of the hearing date at least 2 weeks prior to the hearing. During the hearing, the AIB may consider AIB sanctions in addition to the professor's sanction. See additional sanctions heres here https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gLLyIJ7YuahL0i5jbF6DAdCMNb21EyF9/view?usp=sharing. After the hearing, an outcome will be issued within 4 weeks. 

Students have the right to appeal an AIB decision on a mandatory multiple on the following grounds: 1) Substantial procedural error, 2) New evidence, or 3) Excessive or inappropriate sanction. 

 

​

More Questions

DePaul’s University Center for Writing-based Learning (UCWbL) is a free resource for all members of the DePaul community to receive feedback on writing, ask questions, and collaborate on all stages of the writing process. Writing Consultants at the Writing Center have extensive knowledge and training regarding issues of both citations and plagiarism and are available to work with you in a variety of forms: face-to-face and online & webcam consultations, through the Written Feedback By Email service, and using Quick Questions and Chat with a Tutor. You can make arrangements for all UCWbL services through their website.

​